Finally,
the weather changed and it got a bit cooler outside.
I
am not going to talk a lot about it because I'm stating the obvious.
However, in looking at the forecasts, I can see the temperatures
rising again over the next week or so. It really should not be all
that much of a surprise because we are at the end of
July and the beginning of August when temperatures are quite warm.
Let
me just write about a couple of stories that I have seen recently
that I hope you'll find of interest.
GROCERY
CHAINS
I
am going to be writing a story that you might consider to be a bit
different than normal. I am just experiencing some things which seem
to be odd to me
but I'm not sure that I can "prove" it. Let me explain.
As
I am certain that you know from what I have written before, dear
reader, I like going grocery shopping. I have a favorite store that I
go to once a week. Quite
quite often I go to a different
branded store
in another chain to buy a few extra
products because we are starting to run out of them towards the
middle
of a week.
Let
me be a little bit more direct so you will understand better what I
mean. My family does a lot of our weekly
shopping at Real Canadian Superstore
because it has great products at terrific prices. It is a bit of a
drive to get there from where we live but
we do it once a week. If we start running out of food, rather than
drive all the way back
to RCSS, we drive to a Zehrs store very close to where we live where
we do our purchasing.
Of
course, when we shop, my wife and I have a lot of fun. Importantly
however, we make sure that we can pay as low a price as we possibly
can by purchasing products that are on sale at the low price.
Fortunately, RCSS (and a few other grocery stores) allow us to use
the advertisements of other grocery stores so that we can use the
lower price of products that they are offering to their customers.
Let
me give you an example. Assume that the normal price for the product
that RCSS is offering to its customers when we are shopping there is
$1.75 for it. However, in this week, one of its competitive grocery
stores is advertising that product for sale at $1.25 or a savings of
$.50. As long as we can show that store's advertisement, then we also
can buy that product at the $1.25 price at
RCSS.
As
you can tell, this is a nice way we can save money since we are able
to go to our favourite grocery store and yet, can buy all of the
products that we want that their competitors are offering at the
lower price. To be direct, we can save a lot of money by using all of
these savings from so many stores at RCSS while still getting the
discounts that they offer at
their store and
can take advantage of their lower prices.
However,
dear reader, things seem to be different now. Oh sure, we still go
through our grocery store in detail looking for bargains. We are
usually holding those coupons from other stores which we think get us
a better price in our shopping place and are happy when we find the
product. The problem though is we don't see very many products on
sale anymore. By that, I mean not only in our grocery store but also
in the other stores in town as well whose ads we are holding.
Take
a look at the recent advertisements
from many grocery chains
in
your newspaper or which was delivered to you or which you can see
online. There are a lot of pictures of items that are being offered
to customers. The problem is the pricing is generally not discounted
at all but is the usual product price. The number of products in the
advertisements
that are on sale is much lower it seems to me compared with products
on sale previously.
Obviously,
this means that the stores are not passing on as much money to
customers
as
before on the sales that they are advertising but are keeping more of
the funds for themselves. Is there a reason for this? Perhaps it is
just so that each of the grocery chains can make a lot more money by
not creating as many discount coupons as before.
However,
I suspect that there must be another reason for it. What is that
reason is not certain to me but I suspect it is to create money for
these companies for some purposes that could cost them dearly in the
future. They must want to get as much money as possible today for
any reason that they need it in the future. What I find fascinating
is that it seems that a number of these competing store brands seem
to be following this tactic today and at the same time as their
competitors.
One
day I expect that we will learn the reason.
EMBARRASSING
FOR THIS MUNICIPAL ELECTION CANDIDATE
Poor
Jim Morrison the Municipal Candidate who is running for Councillor in
Windsor in Ward 10. Is his campaign in trouble now based on something
that just happened? I must admit that I found it strange that a
second story came out about this matter
because it seemed to me
to be
all over in the first story written.
I
have written about him a few days ago about the news
story
that involved
him: “ATTACKING A COUNCILLOR.” Actually, I spoke more about his
office manager, Paul Synnott,
in that story. Just go and take a look at it so you will understand
what I mean. Now, what happened before is being publicized again.
Just
go and take a look at this new story,
especially
the first paragraph:
“City
officials not looking into alleged campaign violations
The
City of Windsor is not looking into allegations that Coun. Paul
Borrelli violated municipal policy by promoting recent
accomplishments in Ward 10 just before an election.” (Craig Pearson, Windsor Star, July 19, 2018)
There
was a lot of publicity expressed in that previous story but
the City is doing nothing about it. So
far anyway.
Now
here is what is being said by Morrison's
office manager. It is similar to what he stated
before:
“Synnott
said he did not file a complaint with [integrity
commissioner Bruce] Elman.
“I
don’t want to waste a lot of time and money on this,” Synnott
said. “Ultimately, I just wanted to bring it to the fore.”
After
reading this new story several times, I have to admit that I still do
not understand why it had to be written at all. There really wasn't
anything all that new that was added to it compared with the first
story. Well, I should not say that exactly because here is what Mr.
Synnott said about the only matter that
was of significance;
"He
takes issue only with Borrelli mentioning the ward funds he used for
new bus shelters, since Synnott claims Borrelli didn’t tout that
accomplishment when it was approved in April.
Instead,
Synnott said it was only after his candidate Jim Morrison announced
June 29 he was running in Ward 10 that Borrelli publicly promote his
bus shelter work.”
I
wonder now if anything will happen with Mr. Borrelli since he is
running for re-election. We will just have to wait and see.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.