MISCELLANEOUS
Items Of Interest
I just wanted to write a
Blog about a whole bunch of different stories dealing with matters that are of
interest to me and which I hope you might find interesting as
well.
There are lots of things
happening around here that I find attention-gathering, at least with respect to
my own attention. I must admit that I spend a lot more time thinking about
different things for a number of reasons. Obviously, since I really don't have a
"job" anymore, I don't have to focus on some very direct subjects. I can think
about lots of different matters instead. Some are quite important but others just
happen to be interesting to me so that I can concentrate a lot more of my
attention on them. Let me tell you about some of these
matters.
Obviously, the US election
results are fascinating. I never thought that Donald Trump could possibly be
elected as President of the United States.
I still don't to be honest. I am sure that over the next few months you,
dear reader, will be able to read all kinds of theories about why so many people
voted for Trump to be President. There are all kinds of them
now.
No matter what others say,
I have my own opinion on the subject. Perhaps the prime reason for what happened
is that, unfortunately for her, many US voters were never going to vote for the
wife of former US President Bill Clinton.
Their opposition to him was just so high that they could never support
her no matter how highly qualified that she was.
"Clinton’s campaign
outspent the Trump campaign by more than 2 to 1. While full spending reports are
not yet compiled, campaigns typically spend just about all they raise. As of
October 28, Clinton had raised $687 million compared to Trump’s $307 million—a
124 percent advantage.
And that doesn’t even count
the spending by outside groups (better known as “outside groups”). When added to
the candidates’ own ads, Pro-Clinton ads outnumbered pro-Trump ads 3 to 1—a
mind-numbing 383,512 ads for Clinton compared to 125,617 supporting Trump.
Outside groups raised and spent more than three times as much on Clinton as on
Trump. Super PACs and other groups supporting Clinton raised almost $190
million; those supporting Trump pocketed only $60 million." (Ken Kurson Observer November 10, 2016)
It just seems to me that
this has to be the real reason for it. I was very impressed with Hillary
Clinton. She just seemed so bright in everything that she talked about. Yet, she
lost. I must admit that I would have found it very difficult to vote for her
because of her relationship. Yet, in the end, if I was voting, I would have
voted for her because I could not have voted for Trump at all. In my opinion, I
suspect that many people who actually lived in the United States decided they
could not vote for her no matter what.
I really do a lot of
exercising these days or at least what I consider exercising. In the past, I
hardly did anything compared with what I do today. I do it now because of the
illness that I had almost 2 years ago and which I want to prevent from occurring
again. I want to do this exercising to
keep myself in the best condition that I can. Early on, I had a lot of
difficulty moving around but now I do a lot better.
Three times a day as an
example, before every meal, I go through a number of physical exercises designed
to keep my weight down but also to build up the muscles in my body. Several
times already I have been very upset because my weight has increased and I could
not figure out why because I had not eaten that much food to add on pounds. It
turns out that, because of what I'm doing, my muscles keep growing bigger and
stronger and that is what increases my weight. Yet, what is also fascinating to
me is that my body size does not change very dramatically. I can wear the same
clothes notwithstanding the additional weight put on.
Supposedly, the Federal
Government may well be building a 2nd bridge between Windsor and Detroit. It is
going to take at least 18 months before it will be determined who will build
that bridge and what it will look like.
I just don't get it. What
is the purpose of doing this? During those 18 months, someone needs to explain
to me why the Ambassador Bridge Company would not be allowed to build its 2nd
bridge given all of the work that they have done so far to build their own
bridge. If that happens, what good is a
Government Bridge considering the reduced traffic? In addition, where are the
billions of dollars that will be needed to build a Government bridge coming
from?
We are in the middle of
November now and to be honest I'm very happy with the weather. I was out for a
walk Saturday afternoon and it was very pleasant even though it was a little bit
cooler than before. I must admit that I am surprised that, so far at least, the
weather has been quite good and we have not seen any significant snow
fallings. I just hope that we are that
lucky for a much longer period of time and also that we don't see much snow this
winter no matter what has been projected.
I may well write some
comments later on about the Anne Jarvis columns in the Star dealing with the
border file recently. I must admit that I only see the stories on the Internet
and not in the Star itself because I don't subscribe to this newspaper anymore.
I wonder how much space these stories take up there. They seem quite long compared with her normal
columns. There must be a reason why there is a desire to have her write so much
about this topic. I wonder if the new Star Editor–In–Chief is involved in making
that decision.
Interestingly, when it was
announced that the previous head of the Star was leaving, his replacement was
not announced. I must admit that this lack of information surprised me. All that
I saw in Roseann Danese's article on October 7, 2016 was: "Beneteau’s
replacement has not been named."
I must admit that I have
heard about this music group for a very long time: The Arditti Quartet. It is a
string quartet. I must also admit that I know very little about this group and
have not heard any of their music so far. Of course, I have no idea if there is
any relationship between us given our name. Who knows, perhaps a member of the group may be a relative of mine.
In a story that I read
about what they are doing now, I saw the following comment:
"Of all the leading string
quartets around the world, only the Arditti routinely set themselves the kind of
challenge you’ll hear when they come to Hampstead Arts Festival next week. And
the challenge is they don’t play standard repertoire: the Schubert, Beethoven
and Brahms that forms the bedrock of quartet recitals.
They play music by
contemporary composers: often specially commissioned, being done for the first
time, which means that no one knows if it will fly or
flounder.
There are easier ways to
earn a living. But as Irvine Arditti, the quartet’s leader, says, “I don’t think
I was put on this planet to have an easy life”. And that’s as well because new
compositions aren’t just hard to learn, they’re hard to sell to audiences."
(Bridget Galton Hampstead & Highgate Express November 9, 2016)
Very admirable about what
they do and why. Here is their reason:
"In Hampstead, the lights
will shine brightly. And so will the programmed pieces, which may not be
easy-listening but promise to be alive, exciting, and worth whatever it takes to
engage with them.
“We ask our audience to
trust us”, Irvine says. “I’m glad to say, they usually do”.
Who knows, if they do make
an appearance around here, I just might be one of the audience
members.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.