Let me be direct. I like to
eat meat! I don't care what the diet people say!
To be honest about it, I
don't eat as much meat as I used to do in the past. I can remember when I was
much younger and lived with my parents. At one time, they were both working full
time. Accordingly, it was very difficult for them, especially my mother, to
prepare "well cooked home meals." They just did not have the hours available to
do that. Accordingly, they used to buy lots of steaks which my Mom would cook
for dinner quite often. I loved it!
As I got older, I started
barbecuing the steaks. Oh, my parents did not own the fancy gas-powered
barbecues. Rather, it was a barbecue that required charcoal for cooking the
meat, and sometimes the chicken, for dinner. Of course, I had to start off
barbecuing a hot dog first to give me the strength to cook the main course. It
was fun to do.
Naturally, as I got older,
and had a few dollars in my pocket, I was able to go out and buy a gas BBQ for
my wife and kids after I got married. Oh, I always used natural gas to do my
cooking and did not use a propane BBQ unit. I did not see the purpose of going
out and buying propane gas periodically in order to do the
cooking.
When I first moved to
Windsor and lived in my own home, I purchased my meat a couple times at one of
the so-called "big name" butcher shops. Yes, the meat was quite pricey. However,
I just did not like it. The meat never tasted good the several times I barbecued
it. Fortunately, one of the people who worked at the hotel where I stayed when I
first came to Windsor took me to a meat wholesaler where her father who was a
butcher used buy his meat. I have to admit that, the first time I went there, I
figured that I had to buy at least half a cow every time I needed meat.
Fortunately the butcher there explained the reality! I merely had to purchase
what I wanted. What a relief that was.
The meat that I purchased
for almost 30 years there now since I first moved to Windsor has always been
superb. I really cannot recall any meat that I purchased there not
to be of excellent quality. Just as importantly, the pricing there is quite
attractive compared with the cost at a retail butcher shop.
I have not mentioned the
name of the place where I go shopping for meat. I really do not want to do it in
this article but would be very happy to give you the name of this firm if you
would like to try them out. Just contact me by addressing an email to me.
Otherwise, it does not make sense to have a whole ton of people come there early
on a Saturday morning just to buy a few pieces of meat. It is not a normal
"butcher shop." However, if you are interested in buying 2 or 3 months worth of
meat at a time, then it is a place I really believe you should consider as your
purchasing location.
Oh my goodness! I better
start writing the rest of my articles as quickly as possible. I just feel very
hungry now and think I need some barbecued meat to make me feel better. So, dear
reader, here is the first of several articles that I will be writing
today.
A NEW WAY TO CROSS THE
BORDER.
I find this very
interesting. It is a different way that products can cross the border, in my
opinion, in a much better manner. Here is what I mean:
"A renewed U.S.-Canadian
effort to speed cross-border trade by pre-inspecting cargo at factories and
other sites within the host country could boost productivity in the auto
industry.
After testing the waters
for more than a dozen years, authorities are gearing up to put U.S. Customs and
Border Protection officers on Canadian soil to clear shipments there, rather
than at U.S. ports of entry — and vice versa for Canadian officers." (Eric Kulisch, Automotive News, February 24, 2018)
I must say that to wait a
dozen years seems rather excessive but at least something is being looked at
much more seriously now. The ideal solution would be to have Customs people
approve product being sent over in advance at the manufacturing plant rather
than at the border:
"Canadian officials are
pushing to create secure corridors that would allow trucks to bypass normal
inspection lanes at border checkpoints. Customs officers or authorized third
parties would certify containers and truck trailers as secure before they leave
a factory and would equip them with a tamper-proof electronic seal that could be
tracked to ensure an unbroken chain of custody, and that they didn't deviate
from designated routes."
Let us see what happens,
especially considering the issues with respect to the NAFTA
matters.
THE REALITY OF CANADA/US
TRADE
I saw an interesting news
article dealing with trade between Canada and United States in the Toronto Star:
"Trump’s own economic advisers say he’s wrong: The U.S. has a trade surplus with Canada, not a deficit" (Daniel Dale, Toronto Star, February, 2018)
The material quoted in the
Star article came from a report of almost 600 pages in the Annual Report of the
Council of Economic Advisers. Canada was not mentioned all that often in that
report. Here are the relevant sections that I found that interested me in
relation to our trade with the US. First, I saw these remarks on
calculation on trade between Canada and United States:
"The United States has free
trade agreements (FTAs) with a number of countries— some of which represent net
trade surpluses for the United States (Canada and Singapore), and some of which
represent deficits (Mexico and South Korea).
This becomes immediately
evident when comparing other countries’ trade balances with their volume of
total trade with the United States. In 2016, the United States ran a trade
surplus of $2.6 billion with Canada on a balance-of-payments
basis."
This would appear to me to
set aside any comments made by the US President that Canada runs a
surplus.
In addition, here is some
information about the US export market on agricultural
products:
"The top three export
markets for U.S. agricultural products in 2016 were China, Canada, and Mexico;
together, these three countries accounted for 44 percent of all agricultural
exports."
It must be that we buy a
lot of products from the US for eating in Canada.
Of course, you may think
that this material will help Canada in any arguments with United States. If that
is what you think, consider this remark in the article:
"There is no indication, of
course, that a president unenthusiastic about policy details and numerical
accuracy will be swayed by a sentence or two buried in a lengthy official report
he is unlikely to have read."
FRASER INSTITUTE'S ANNUAL
RANKINGS OF PUBLIC SCHOOLS.
As I am sure you know, dear
reader, when a child does something wrong, he/she tries to make up a good excuse
to prevent any punishments from the parents. That makes sense to do, don't you
think? Who wants to get into trouble!
Consider this… How bad is
the situation in our area:
"Nine of 12 public school
board high schools recorded an increase in the percentage of tests not meeting
expected provincial standards in the 2016-17 rankings of Ontario secondary
schools released this week by the Fraser Institute.
Every public high school
except Tecumseh Vista Academy, Kingsville and Sandwich recorded an increase in
the percentage of tests not achieving Level 3 or 4 in EQAO testing for Grade 9
applied and academic math and the literacy test in Grade 10." (Dave Waddell, Windsor Star, February 22, 2018)
Will the School Board in
the area take responsibility for this negative situation that has happened here?
Seriously, now what do you think their position will be. How about this as the
first interesting comment in the story:
"The Greater Essex County
District School Board does not believe that the ranking of schools based on
limited data is constructive or fair,” said board spokesperson Scott
Scantlebury.
“We feel that all our
schools are excellent places to learn and each one has unique attributes that
make it great.”
Sure, sure, sure. I guess
that someone must be just delusional in thinking that there are any problems.
Unfortunately, that someone does not seem to understand that merely because they
are great places to learn does not seem to mean that anyone is doing
well.
Pshaw...Compare yourself
with others? How foolish can that be:
"Whether the trends are up
or down, we oppose the concept of ranking schools,” said Stephen Fields,
communications coordinator for the Catholic board.
“The stuff that matters for
us is looking at each school and comparing it year to year to its own
performance. We only look at ourselves.”
Sure, why be compared with
others to see how good you are and how well you're doing educating the children
who come to your schools. Just because others are doing so much better than you
are means absolutely nothing.
Why do you want to do
better? Who wants an "A" as the mark for the work that is
done:
"We are working hard to do
better, not for the sake of higher test scores or a subjective ranking, but to
provide for every student the greatest opportunity to
succeed.”
Sure, nevermind if the
student does better or not, let us just continue providing
"opportunities."
There, that should set out
how one does the marking for the tests for our Education Boards! Accordingly,
our board members will always pass well based on this method of marking
results.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.