I really do enjoy writing a
whole bunch of articles for one big Blog file. It just feels being
so productive to be able to do that. After all, I read something interesting and
I just feel like sharing it with so many people who look at my
website.
So here come a whole bunch
of new stories and my comments for you to consider.
BIG COST
INCREASES
I really should no longer
find it strange that the cost for building a construction project is extremely
high. How many times have we seen that the estimated cost of a project is a lot
less than what the bid prices are from the various bidders.
Here is just another
example of the awarded cost being a lot higher than what the estimate
was.
"River Canard bridge to
undergo $500,000 rehabilitation
The county will spend
almost $500,000 to keep the historic bridge over River Canard in tip-top
shape...
Because the bridge is
located near provincially significant wetlands that require “significant dust
control measures,” bids came in significantly above the engineer’s estimate of
$400,000 for the work." (Julie Kotsis, Windsor Star, March 16,
2016)
WHAT OTHER WORK NEEDS TO BE
DONE
This ought to scare
everyone. Does it mean that one ought to expect a whole bunch of other work be
done on this underground tunnel because of its age. We have already seen massive
amounts of work that are taking place at the Ambassador Bridge because of its
aging:
"The Windsor-Detroit Tunnel
will be closing overnight five days a week beginning in August for replacement
of its original concrete roof.
“It’s a scheduled project
and if you look at tunnels in the United States and Canada they have a lifespan,
just like the roof on your house has a lifespan, and so this is just a scheduled
replacement,” said tunnel president Neal Belitsky...
This will be the first time
the tunnel will be closing for work since 1993 when the road was resurfaced."
(Chris Thompson, Windsor Star, March 16, 2016)
It will be an interesting
project. One can only hope that it is handled smoothly. After all, such a
project has not been handled for a very long time at the
Tunnel:
"This will be the first
time the tunnel will be closing for work since 1993 when the road was
resurfaced."
IF ONLY THE GOVERNMENT
MICHIGANDERS KNEW THAT THEY ARE NEVER BUILDING A BRIDGE
Or maybe a whole bunch of
them know that already!
It is so silly now.
Michigan is not going to build a "second," new bridge a couple of miles away
from the Ambassador Bridge. At least, that is my opinion. If I'm right, then
there was no need to publish a story like this:
"State wants Moroun
trucking terminal for Gordie Howe
Bridge
Another dispute is building
between the State of Michigan and Manuel (Matty) Moroun involving the Gordie
Howe Bridge; this time, it's the state wanting to take some of the Ambassador
Bridge owner's property in southwest Detroit.
The state says it needs a
portion of a 42-acre trucking terminal Moroun owns to build an approach to the
new Gordie Howe Bridge, a project the trucking and shipping magnate has strongly
opposed because it will rival his Ambassador Bridge...
“Obviously, we got to have
it,” said Mohammed Alghurabi, a project manager for the Michigan Department of
Transportation. “If you’re going to build your river-crossing span, you have to
connect it to your approach.” (Joe Guillen, Detroit Free Press March 14, 2016)
Just relax, Mohammed. As
far as I'm concerned, the road for the 2nd bridge, right beside the existing
Ambassador Bridge, is practically finished now so there is no need for a new
approach. Why do you think that this road has been built in first place!
Seriously, why would a
Government want to spend $5 billion plus for a bridge across the River when one
can build the Ambassador Bridge 2nd bridge for about a 10th of that cost i.e.
for only around $500 million.
As I read in a different
article, do you really think that there would be a whole bunch of people who
want to invest in a big project. This quote ought to help you:
"Canada Pension, like many
other large global investors, would rather acquire mature infrastructure assets
than finance new projects because they’re safer, Wiseman said." (Scott Deveau, Bloomberg, March 16, 2016)
DO WE WANT EXPENSIVE HOMES
IN WINDSOR
Of course we do,
right! We buy a house at a low price and then, as its cost
increases rapidly, we make a fortune. Absolutely perfect,
right.
Well, consider this that
suggests prices being reasonable makes a lot more sense:
"Windsor has become an
attractive destination for Syrian refugees living in more expensive regions of
Canada because of its affordable housing and its multicultural
community
Omar Farzat recently
arranged for his cousin's family to move from Toronto, largely because of
inexpensive housing.
"They can get settled
easier," he told CBC News. "They can get a cheaper house, cheaper stuff, so it's
better for many aspects..."
Officials in Windsor do not
have the number of refugees who have moved to the city from other regions in the
country, but it happens regularly, according to the New Canadian Centre of
Excellence." (CBC News, March 23, 2016)
When you get people from
other areas who want to succeed in the new one that they have found, then
everyone here prospers. That's my opinion
anyway!
MORE OF MY REVIEWS
NEEDED
I better start writing more
ASAP.
Why? Here's a note I
received from "tripadvisor" about an article I wrote for them:
"You're in the top
25%
With 5,309 readers, you're
one of the most popular reviewers in Windsor. Keep those great opinions coming.
Plus, each review gets you closer to your next level with TripCollective, our
contributor recognition program."
DOWNTOWN PURCHASE
INCENTIVES
Wow, I did not realize that
the City of Windsor might help people buy their homes downtown soon. Gee, if I
had known that, why would I have moved to Tecumseh even if it is such fantastic
property in this part of the Province.
Nope, I could have stayed
downtown and allowed the City to help the finance a new home there and offer all
kinds of incentives. I could have shopped at places that the City would help
finance as well:
"Study looks at boosting
downtown Windsor residency
The city is looking at
offering tax incentives and home improvement grants that would encourage people
to move downtown.
A study is underway,
examining how to boost residency and business operations in an area that hasn’t
seen a lot of growth.
“We’re anticipating that at
the end of the day, it will lead to a community improvement plan that will allow
for financial incentives,” Neil Robertson, the City of Windsor’s manager of
urban design, said Tuesday. “It would be safe to say we’re going to end up with
some incentive program around encouraging residential development to attract
people downtown, and probably a retail component, too.” (Craig Pearson, Windsor
Star March 22, 2016)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.