Every so often I do find an article that I think is
interesting to write about. Here is a bunch of them.
OUR $78 MILLION SWIMMING POOL
Apparently, that is what it cost to build the swimming pool
in our downtown. Quite a bit of money isn't it!
I must admit that a number of decision-makers in Windsor must have made the
decision early on to build this swimming building after determining that we
were going to make a lot of money with its operation. Unfortunately, that is
not happening. I saw this in an Anne Jarvis story in the Windsor Star on June
24, 2017:
"The city had to control the aquatic centre’s costs, it
said. Families must be able to afford the admission price, it said. It was like
the aquatic centre’s success hinged in part on the lowest paid employees
getting even less.
Since then, the aquatic centre has haemorrhaged money,
costing $3.2 million a year to operate. The price of admission has increased.
And the city is pumping $200,000 a year into marketing it."
Here are some other figures that you may find interesting
that are quite depressing:
"The number of paying customers at the Adventure Bay dropped by 43 per cent from its
first year of operation to its third.
Adventure
Bay attendance by the
numbers:
Year 1: 184,000
Year 2: 128,000
Year 3: 105,000" (CBC News, February 17, 2017)
I am not going to go into a lot of stories about problems
that the aquatic centre is having. That has been reported previously. Now there is another problem financially for
the pool that I found quite interesting:
"The Ontario Pay Equity Hearings Tribunal ruled April
11 that the City of Windsor
must pay Shirley Moor, who works part-time at the reception desk of the WFCU
Centre, all the money she missed plus interest after the city temporarily
reduced wages for about 300 workers in an attempt to offset costs of the new
$78-million aquatics complex."
(Craig Pearson, Windsor Star, June 16, 2017)
Here is what the City is going to do:
"Even if the pay equity tribunal upholds the decision
for Moor, Dilkens said the city does not plan to compensate the 300 part-time
employees in similar positions."
According to the Mayor:
"[Mayor Drew Dilkens said]…we will seek a judicial
review of the decision.”
Even if the pay equity tribunal upholds the decision for
Moor, Dilkens said the city does not plan to compensate the 300 part-time
employees in similar positions. If all 300 received on average the same amount
as Moor, the city would be on the hook for $1.2 million."
I must admit that I have to scratch my head and try to
figure this out. I wish someone would tell me why the City is not liable to all
of these other people. What is so different about their position and that of
Ms. Moor? If there is no difference, then why doesn't the City just pay the
amounts owing now? Is it going to suggest that 299 other people start lawsuits
against them?
WHO WILL RUN FOR MAYOR IN WINDSOR
Oh dear! Has the brother of our former Mayor, Eddie Francis,
who is now sitting as a Windsor Councillor going to decide shortly that he
better not run for Mayor of the City of Windsor and then will make a public
announcement immediately? Thanks so much Gord Henderson for this information:
"Dilkens insists he won’t make a formal announcement
regarding a second term until early 2018 but you can bet the farm, nearly
three-quarters of the way through his initial term, that he has no intention of
surrendering the keys to the corner office any time soon.
“This is the best job in the world and I now understand why
there were 12 of us running in 2014,” confided a happy and confident Dilkens
this week." (Gord Henderson, Windsor Star, June 24, 2017)
Clearly, it must mean that no one of any significance will
run against the Mayor because he/she would lose badly. Right?! Why what do you think, dear reader, after
this last paragraph by Gord in his article:
"Dilkens has more than met expectations. But his
ace-in-the-hole, leading up to next year’s election, is the booming area
economy. With a hot real estate sector, a record low jobless rate and employers
wailing that they can’t find qualified workers, pitching the claim that Windsor needs new
leadership will be one tough sell."
What Gord did not do is demonstrate to us what the Mayor's
actions did to improve our economy so well!
What if the Mayor decides not to run again but not until
some time close to election day in 2018? It could be because he receives a very
nice employment job at that time from someone.
Who knows, as an example he might become the paid Head of a new
organization, Metropolitan Windsor, that would be formed by the Provincial
Government combining all of the various governments in this area in a manner
similar to what was done in Metropolitan Toronto a number of years ago. He
would be our "Fred Gardiner."
Guess who might then decide to run for Mayor and who would
have a lot of skill assistants behind him to help him win!
DEPARTMENT STORE STORIES
A couple of interesting Sears stories:
"The Sears Home store in Windsor
is one of 59 locations under the axe after the once-mighty retail giant
announced Thursday it is shuttering buildings and cutting 2,900 jobs under a
court-supervised restructuring.
The struggling company says it will close 20 full-line
locations, plus 15 Sears
Home stores, 10 Sears
Outlet stores and 14 Sears Hometown locations. Included on the list is the Sears Home
location on Legacy Park Drive
in Windsor."
(Trevor Wilhelm, Windsor Star, June 22, 2017)
Then this publication from Brandon G. Stranzl, Executive
Chairman, Sears Canada on June 23, 2017:
"All of the above being said, Sears Canada has just
been through a long decade during which it was not innovating and reinventing
its business, not listening to customers and not evolving to serve Canada's
needs. This has left Sears Canada in the unfortunate position of having parts
of the company that are no longer applicable to our customer needs, nor financially
viable…
in order to continue to serve our customers and chart our
path forward, Sears Canada has filed for and obtained protection from its
creditors with the intention of further restructuring our business. We are
going to close some of our stores, which is in part recognition that many of
our customers prefer to shop online, and because we want to be a more focused
retailer."
That explains why the Sears outlet in Windsor is going to close.
I wonder financially how that outlet was working out. As an
example, was it making or losing money? What will happen now? Will its
operation now be taken on at the main Sears store in Devonshire Mall or
will that operation be completely ended because it just does not make enough
money?
I do not think that there is any easy answer considering the
problems that so many organizations are having these days in running their
future businesses. So many are going bankrupt now that seemed to do so well in
the past because of the way those businesses are running their operations now.
Their techniques just do not seem to work any more.
Take a look at this story that shows what Walmart may be
doing in the US
to deliver its goods to customers at their homes through the assistance of
their employees. Clearly, permanent customer truck drivers do not seem to be
the way to carry out this activity in an economic fashion:
" In its continuing battle with Amazon, Walmart is
testing a new type of delivery service: Employees dropping off packages on
their way home.
The service, which has been tested since April but was just
announced Thursday, pays employees extra to deliver online orders headed to
destinations along their normal route home. It's the latest example of how
the world's biggest retailer is leveraging its large network of stores and 1
million employees to go head to head with e-commerce giant Amazon.
"Our stores put us within 10 miles of 90% of the U.S.
population,'' Marc Lore, president and CEO of Walmart eCommerce U.S.. said
in a blog post announcing the pilot. "Now imagine all the routes our
associates drive to and from work and the houses they pass along the way. It’s
easy to see why this test could be a game-changer." (Charisse Jones, USATODAY, June 1, 2017)
I do remember what was happening in my life when I was a
child so many years ago. As an example, I remember horse-pulled milk carts that
came around every day to our house to offer our family dairy products. How about Eaton's and Simpsons, the major
Department stores in Toronto which no longer exist, sending out their
customers' purchased goods to their homes the next day in their motorized
delivery trucks. At no increase in price either for the delivery.
Does it really mean not that the major selling companies are
doing something new these days to figure out ways to get goods to their
customers but trying to remember what they did in the past and what they must
do now to duplicate that service to remain in business!